Payday loansdamaged flashlight pic
young and naked pics
pictures tiny black penis
old mature pussy pics
amy fischer naked pictures
adult couple pic posts
online game naked pics
real nice pussy pics
self amateur blonde pics
nude celebrities free pictures
nude chubby teen pictures
breast augmention pictures
granny sex pictures 3
free sex picture tgp
gillian chung sex pics
real celebrity nude pictures
silver picture frames
bunny swan character pic
philippine pictures date love
gemma atkinson naked pictures
matthew rush nude pics
boy twinks cock pics
pictures sexy little tots
free sex picture series
hot naruto girls pics
thalia prada shemale pics
native american nude pics
free cleaning images
bam margera tattoos pictures
free horse mating pic
jack sparrow fan pic
pic controlled ultrasonic radar
garcelle beauvias bikini pics
picture of funny keys
free sexy pics search
helen steele nude pics
naked fat women pics
trifold picture frames
nude amature pictures
couples straight sex pictures
lesbian pic picture teen
turtle picture frames
cartoon pic black babies
madison stone pic porn
pictures of toon sex
diarrhea porn pictures
movie stars nude pics
family sex webcam pictures
maxim magazine free pics
eva larue nude pictures
porn pictures of leabians
mistresses cbt free pics
vanessa lengies nude pics
free bisexual threesome pics
freeamateur nude pics
free nude chinese pictures
venessa millano nude pics
funny runescape pictures
malika sherawat nude pics
pics ofmy sister naked
christmas celerbirty pictures
sexy naked films pictures
andrea marie nude pics
myle cyrus nude pics
kimberley koopmans nude pictures
free panty pics photos
marge simpson sexy pics
naked celeberity pics
beyonc knowles nude pictures
bare background images
free nude pics clebs
funny clip art pictures
nudevanessa hudgens pic
glenda jackson naked pictures
free pics teens ling
korea pussy pictures
linsey dawn free pics
borderland pic games
selena gomez rare pictures
free naked cosplay pics
free inuyasha hentai pic
sex position pictures guides
lonely housewives nude pics
naked pictures of girl
funny amimal pictures
nuns pics free erotic
louise glover naked pic
vannessa hugnes nude pics
katie rees free pics
dragonsworn daoc pic
free horny russian pic
hot female soldier pics
dasiy chain sex pics
saori yamamoto nude pics
sexy scarlett johannason pictures
nude home wife pictures
young pussy fuck pics
monica belluci pic gallery
hot skater guys pics
alyssa milano ass pics
crackle eczema pictures
rebecca depietro nude pics
sunrise adams nude pics
free western interior images
online webcams porn pictures
pictures of dessert animals
funny pictures of saddam
vennessa hudges nude pictures
precut picture frames
free anen symone pics
pic quick convenience stores
free nude pornstar pics
nude japanese schoolgirl pics
ayesha omer naked pics
free pics volleyball beach
free pussy shemale pictures
top asian porn pictures
ghost and spirit pictures
fre animal sex pictures
miniskirt fishnet porn pictures
big picture welcome flowers
free xxx mobile pics
lonnie anderson nude pics
pic programming book
effect of smoking pic
pictures of pussy nude
common grackle young pic
hilary duff sexy pics
real penis pumping pics
loverboy big picture
shawn johnson spread pic
holly willoughby naked pics
ghost red tailed boa pictures
krystal red nude pics
google sattalite pictures
britney speard nude pics
japanese sideways pussy pics
sarah polley nude pics
lesbians sex live pictures
natalie reeves pics hot
atk panties free images
farrah franklin nude pictures
vicky lamotta nude pictures
naked young people pictures
sexy pornographic pictures
holly wood sex pictures
cheerleader sex pictures
pure sex free images
serenity davis prengnant pic
venus terzo nude pics
image search web site
dolly parton nude pics
nude ashlee simpson pictures
free online dermatology pics
nude teen amateur pics
naked pictures older women
bronze metal picture frames
nude pictures retro only
nude pictures of julia louis dryfess
free brazilian sex pics
family nudist home pics
naked racy free pictures
free images of easter
sharper image wireless headphone
safety halloween pictures
nude pictures of lisa
naked women pics orange
pictures of jasmine flower
estella warren naked pics
free butfucking pics
free teen lesbain pics
coaches gift picture frames
dragon quiz with pic
adult teacher porn pictures
mila kunis naked pics
amazing teenie pic galleries
free midgett porn pics
teen amateur pic posting
buxom brunettes free pics
really scary ghost pictures
analog input pic project
katie leung sexy pic
free thumbnail pussy pics
lucy lawless battlestar pic
britney spears topless pic
18th century merchant pic
skin abcess ulcer pic
music pictures of you
Payday Loans
The Moral Challenge of Religious Diversity PDF Print E-mail

Lewis Rambo, San Francisco Theological Seminary

delivered at the
International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
"Religious Freedom in Latin America and the New Millennium"
October 10-12, 1998, Sheraton Mofarrej Hotel, Sao Paolo, Brazil

At conferences such as this it is very common for us to affirm religious diversity and the importance of dialogue. All of us would agree with that. What I would like to do is derive something of an overview of the contours of the issues in relationship to religious pluralism, as well as to the issue of how do we do dialogue, not just merely affirming these things, but getting down to some of the hard work of how this is done.

So I would like to provide something that might be called a grammar of pluralism. How do we explore the deep structures of the issues that we confront when we talk about pluralism and the imperative for dialogue? This is an important issue in my own life, having grown up in a small town in west Texas as a member of the Church of Christ, which some of you may know if you know something about American religious history. It is a very conservative, fundamentalist church that essentially considers itself the one true truth, which excludes the validity of all other Christians on the face of the earth, much less Buddhists and Hindus and so forth, who are not even in the equation. So you can imagine the impact of going to graduate school and other kinds of institutions where I was coming face to face with people from other traditions. How does one negotiate this?

So the issue of pluralism was both pushed into my face, as well as something that, as time went on—teaching at the Graduate Theological Union at Berkeley—actually came to be something that I relished. One of the things that I want to emphasize is that it is very easy to affirm religious pluralism and the importance of dialogue. I think, though, that it is extraordinarily difficult to do it with authenticity and integrity and to have lasting impact. In other words, it is very easy to come to a conference such as this and almost have a celebration of diversity and dialogue. But to actually engage in significant dialogue later is an extraordinarily difficult challenge.

Growing up in the sectarian background, you can imagine that there were many jokes about this kind of an issue. We had a number of lawyer jokes and so forth. But let me give you one. The typical joke is somebody dies and goes to heaven. And someone is now giving them a tour. Heaven, of course, is vast and beautiful. It is filled with Roman Catholics, it is filled with Orthodox Christians, it is filled with Baptists, it is filled with Seventh Day Adventists, even with some Buddhists and Hindus and so forth. But as the tour goes on, they go further and further and further into the hinterland of heaven. And for a time there is almost no one there. Finally they get to a point in heaven where the guide in heaven says, now be very quiet, because just around the corner we will find the members of the Church of Christ, but be very quiet because they think they are the only ones in heaven.

The issue of religious pluralism is one that in the past was something we didn’t really have to deal with very much because most people lived in a relatively isolated community. When there was contact between religious groups, the boundaries were usually very clearly drawn because of ethnicity, nationality, and other kinds of issues, so that there was rarely significant interaction in most places in the world. It was rarely a significant intellectual issue except for questions such as how do you condemn other religious groups, and/or, how do you do apologetics in such a way that you can persuade them into your particular version of the truth.

But in the last 100 years or so, because of communications, because of mobility and so forth, whether we like it or not, we have been thrown into a world in which virtually no one can escape the reality of other religious groups. As Peter Berger and other sociologists of religions have pointed out, when one comes in contact with other religious groups, often, especially for those who are still engaged in what might be called a lust for servitude, they are profoundly disturbed by meeting people who have different religious orientations. This creates a profound problem for many people and there are many different reactions to this. I came from these people who believe that the proper response is to try to convert those who disagree with you. That is the way to deal with it. That particular strategy is actually relatively easy and can make your life relatively simple because the world is clearly divided up and one doesn’t have to worry too much.

At the other extreme—which I think is very popular in circles in which many of us may delve, especially people in academic institutions and people who are bureaucrats in religious organizations—is the theological position that might be called inclusivism. It is the exact opposite: We are ultimately trying to say the same thing. We may have different languages, we may have different rituals, and so forth, but ultimately all roads lead to God or to the Transcendent or whatever. Both of those positions are relatively easy, in the sense that you either exclude everyone, or, on the other hand, in what I would consider to be a rather bland, naive inclusivism, defend the idea that we are all doing the same thing. In all the situations I’ve found myself where that kind of position has been articulated, most of the people in the group, those that are committed to religious traditions that have deep and long histories, know that there are unique particularities to our group that we want to be heard.

So it seems to me that the position that I once advocated in the face of pluralism and the complexity, is one in which we see dialogue not as simply finding points of convergence—although I would agree with the first speaker that finding these points of contact are very important. But I think what is even more profound is when we discipline ourselves and discipline is where the moral challenge of religious pluralism enters. That is, I believe that we have a moral imperative to listen with authenticity, to listen with generosity, and to engage one another in ways so that people are heard at a very deep level.

Not merely, "Oh, isn’t it nice to have this conversation?" But, what is your history? What is your tradition? How do we engage one another in ways that we can see that it is not merely a bland celebration of things that we all have in common? But rather, what are the distinctive gifts that you bring to this discussion. What can we learn, for example, from the Jewish community? How do you survive in the face of thousands of years of persecution? How do they maintain integrity and strength? What are the distinctive theological positions that they carry? What are the organizational strategies that they have developed in order to survive and, I would even argue, to thrive, in extraordinarily hostile environments? We can ask this of many of the groups, Jehovah’s Witnesses or Coptic Christians in Egypt, or wherever you might want to say that these places exist.

So the strategy that I would argue is that, for religious pluralism to make sense, more than just merely "live and let live" would be a theological position that would invite serious dialogue. Now this kind of dialogue is very hard work. Anybody who doesn’t believe that really hasn’t tried. Because I know in many different situations when I entered into this kind of discussion, I had very good intentions, but oftentimes it is very difficult to set aside my history, my convictions, in order to really listen to someone who has a radically different point of view. In fact, in many positions the real test of being able to live with pluralism is to listen to people who would condemn you. Or would condemn me. In many of these kinds of situations, we need to face the fact that the real test of pluralism will be for those of us who are from more mainline traditions and so forth to allow and support groups that if they were in power, they would probably want to run us out of the country; put us in prison, or condemn us to eternal damnation. The limits of our generosity are sometimes pushed in these kinds of dialogues.

Now let me give some examples of some issues that I think should be dealt with in this kind of authentic dialogue that goes beyond mere patting each other on the back. I mentioned already that it is still important for each of us to affirm and celebrate our own tradition. I also think that before we can engage in certain kinds of dialogues and discussions—and this is especially true for the majority group, whatever that might be—if you are in Texas, the Southern Baptists, if you are in most of Latin America, it would be the Roman Catholic Church. In the United States it would be Christians, vis-a-vis the Jews, Muslims, etc. But whoever is in the majority needs, I think, to do a very careful assessment of their own history and what we have done to the outsider, to the marginal person, in this case we are talking about religious groups.

I think that before serious dialogue can ever take place with Jews, for example, all Christians, especially those of us who have roots in Europe and the traditions that have contributed to 2,000 years of persecution and murder of Jews, need to do a long historical confession of our sins, for if not our complicity, then in terms of creating an ideology that in many cases feeds anti-Semitism. In other words, I think in many situations what needs to happen is a confession of sins of the majority group.

Recently I have been doing some study of Native Americans or indigenous people in the United States. Of course, you have this similar issue here in Latin America. I think that before the Christian community in the United States can ever deal with some of the more recent issues of Asian immigration and so forth, we must deal with the issue of what Christians have done in the United States in the colonial period and earlier, vis-a-vis Native Americans. What did we do vis-a-vis Africans who were brought here as slaves? I think the beginning point of serious dialogue is the confession of our own sins.

Most of us don’t want to think about this stuff. As I was thinking about this presentation, I realized that the memory of the victim is very long. The memory of the perpetrator is very short and very distorted. So those of us who are white Christians in the majority of different places, we think, "oh, it is no big deal, it was a long time ago," blah, blah, blah. But my experience has been—and I have done work mostly in Korea, Japan, and China with regard to some of these issues—even though the missionary enterprise has been long transformed, people remember what Christian missionaries have done in all of these places to denigrate, to ridicule, and to punish thousands upon thousands of people who did not conform to various forms of Christian orthodoxy, whether it be the Roman Catholic version of orthodoxy or the Protestant version of orthodoxy. So we must be aware that before significant dialogue can happen, we have to face up to the victim, of what we have done. The victim remembers. We want to forget—those of us who perpetrated it.

One of the things I would like to propose in thinking about this conference and talking with people, and I think this will emerge even more as our time together goes on, is to call for, in a sense, a new job description or perhaps a new vocation. In my field of pastoral care and counseling in the last couple of decades, we have been emphasizing the importance of cross-cultural counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and so forth in order to build bridges. It seems to me that we have come to a time when we need to have people whose vocation it is to be substantial, in-depth people who can deal with the issues of religious dialogue. So that, for example, when we talk about cross-cultural counseling, we believe that people need to be fluent in at least two languages. To spend time within another culture so it is not just a passing interest. It is not something you can just read a few books about.

And I would argue that the same thing should happen with people who are called to the vocation of dealing with religious pluralism in-depth. So I am calling for those of us in the academic institutions: let’s start creating some courses, let’s start communities so people can actually deal with the issue of religious pluralism in something other than just a litany of "isn’t nice, let’s do it, let’s be friendly." I am arguing, let us move to a new depth so that with this kind of understanding we can grow and develop with much more maturity and with much more sophistication.

This calls for extraordinary discipline and, I argue, extraordinary courage. Probably many of us come from traditions where this kind of vocation would be ridiculous. We are not going to win any points with most of our communities of origin for this kind of thing. But we must move into the 21st century with dignity, courage, and a vision for how all the religions of the world can work together in ways that are not just a few friendly meetings, but in-depth significant relationships that would lead to a richer understanding of God, a richer understanding of nature and of our neighbor, whoever that neighbor might be.