Payday loansmahagany poker table 1900s
poker770
palace station vegas
la night casino party
hotels by the meadows
lyrics for money
mad libs online
youngstown poker
italian stereotypes
russian roulette
casino control regulations
indian gambling
play online poker
play rumble robots
paradise casino
thousand islands poker
online poker
play sun bingo
bonus code deposit party
online poker game
niagara falls casino
fire poker
casino royal yak
poker chip
ein gutes online
royal casino studio
double diamond penny slot
casino spel
real powerful money
slot machine plastic
www casino virgin
poker run
bonus bingo multi draw
valley view casino
pc game poker
gambling companies for
pogo
simcity 5 gambling
eminiclip book of ra
captain jack casino bonus
erie casino
jobe at foxwoods
star casino
morongo casino near
best atlantic city casino for
2009 world series of poker
london palace
how to apply for grant
money games for grade
atlantic city casinos out of
paradise poker
7 cedars casino
mav getminted
how play
mandalay bay casino
largest casino gaming
epiphone casino limited edition gold
craps online how to
palace casino
campaign money for
wake forest north carolina
demo casino games
bingo call
gold coast casino restaurants las
guillame poker journal de montr
growth factor for gambling
jocuri casino poker
lucky pryamid
slot machines with random
play angel s touch pokie
onlinepoker casino
online poker
restaurante casino
no money down real estate
casino closing in atlantic
casino online dealer hiring july
bingo
real online casino
menukaart casino
ontario northland bus to casino
riviera hotel and casino
clips of girls playing strip
spin palace
tidal wave casino
tournament poker no limit
ziad rahbani concert casino du
hotel casino carrasco ofertas
scranton pa
texas holdem starter
moorish pleasure palace
casino del sol
casino rama shows august
can you make real money on eve
merkur casino
caribbean play poker
vistasol punta cana ex carabela beach resort
http
grand casino hinckley concerts
chica poo casino eagle
gambling
casino
live casino partners
best online blackjack for
sedona royal
united keetoowah band
schecter c1 blackjack
best casino punta
draw poker
baccarat ornament
new bedford
motorcycle poker run
mirage casino
play nfl blitz demos
stop ring tone on
wynn casino red
poker bonus codes wordpress
casino harrahs il
texas holdem card
gold coast casino
all slots mobile casino
blackjack java
casino king
luxor hotel and casino pyramid queen
heart concert grand casino
jugar al casino en
blackjack 2
new jersey internet gambling
hotel mgm grand hotel casino las
palm gambling online
palace
bet365 casino
government money for landfill
porno poker backgammononline
crystal palace
build a slot machine
online gambling
crown bingo
tout les nouveau casino
list of online gambling
new orleans casino
vice russian roulette
chinook winds casino linclon city
california state gambling commission bingo
conrad bimini bay resort
cow palace san francisco
companies money for art in
safe online casinos
money party play
play games online for
empire poker
stratosphere casino
brisbane casino
how to play blackjack card game not
palm springs casino
mazarro sea palace
island view casino in gulfport
australian online gambling
casino st louis mo
is live roulette
thunder valley casino
upload for
blackjack ii
deposit western union 24 hours
cda casino hunk
poker
craps layout for pool
convenience store not casino
madagascan gin
october 7 poker run
play pokemon online leaf
gambling
best casinos in deadwood
louisiana lake ccharles
biggest online slot
online gambling for u s
holland casino utrecht
oklahoma indian casinos
indian casinos in vancouver
book of ra online bet
casinos in ames
are there slot machines in the las vegas
casino tropez
bonanza bank slot
meet the argosy casino
best casino
poker hand
the palace waterbury
gold coast casino super bowl
Payday Loans
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints PDF Print E-mail

Timothy Flannagan

delivered at the
International Coalition for Religious Freedom Conference on 
"Religious Freedom and the New Millenium"
Washington DC, April 17-19, 1998

I am here to discuss dramatic instances of religious persecution that may at first glance appear as somewhat of a hangnail. That is the use of law in the United States to prevent churches and religious groups from establishing houses of worship or religious edifices of some kind. These laws come under the categories of zoning laws and land-use laws. I hope to illustrate why this is something that we might want to concentrate on.

A few years ago several of my friends and colleagues at Brigham Young University worked on a study of the cases in which religious groups in the United States had sought permission to establish a new church house in various locations. The study started from the basic proposition that if the laws of land-use planning and zoning were, to borrow the Supreme Court’s terms, generally applicable and neutral, then the policy should impact all religions and other applicants in more or less the same way. The study not only failed to find that sort of consistency, but found a huge disparity. While minority religions represent just 9 percent of the general population of this country, they were involved in over 49 percent of the cases regarding the right to locate a religious building at a particular site, and lost more of those cases than you would expect given the overall caseload.

I would like to illustrate this by describing the recent experience of the Latter Day Saints church in attempting to establish a temple. I am referring to a building of special religious significance for us in the community of Forest Hills, Tennessee, just outside Nashville. In 1991, by coincidence just after the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division vs. Smith that articulated the generally applicable and mutual test, the city of Forest Hills adopted a comprehensive zoning plan. The plan emphasized the overwhelmingly residential aspect of the city and set aside a specific zone in which religions could establish themselves and build churches. The problem was that there were four churches in the city of Forest Hills, and they already occupied all the property that was zoned as educational and religious property. There was simply no other land available. The LDS church, after several false starts, acquired a parcel located at the intersection of two major highways, really not suitable for residential use and also adjacent to three other churches. So it was very close to the property that had been zoned in this manner.

The church sought a variance from the local zoning ordinance. After considerable discussion and the presentation of building plans for that site—which were to construct a building very much in keeping with the character of the religious buildings located on the adjacent property—the city zoning board turned the church down, saying that, “The temple would not be in the best interest of and promote the public health, safety, morals, convenience, or the general welfare of the city.” The city board of commissioners accepted this recommendation. Since it had now become painfully clear to the church that the city of Forest Hills was not going to approve any site the church selected, the church reluctantly decided to press its case in court. By sheer bad luck, in the course of that case the Supreme Court issued its decision in the Flores case, which undid the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Although the church does not have any evidence, and does not in fact believe that there was religious persecution involved in the denial of its request with respect to this property, the lesson is that the test which the Supreme Court has articulated works a great hardship on religions, particularly minority religions, that may be attempting to establish themselves in a given community.

Let me just touch on one other area. This relates to the receipt of tithes and offerings. Many religions as part of their practice have an offering that is received by the church. The offerings sometimes intersect with bankruptcy law. The church now has pending before it requests from trustees in bankruptcy situations where a member of the church has paid his tithe and then gone into a bankruptcy proceeding. There are 400 requests to return that money to the trustee that the church is contesting. Fortunately, the picture here is quite good. Two recent decisions, one, in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and one, in the District Court in Idaho (neither involving the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints directly), confirm that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is alive and well, at least as it applies to federal bankruptcy law.

I have spoken primarily of minority churches, but in fact, every church is a minority church, somewhere. In my wife’s neighborhood in Salt Lake City, I dare say that there the majority church would be the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Many of you followed the recent and so far at least happy tale relating to the Islamic Education Center that is proposed to be built in Ashburn in Loudon County in the Washington area. These issues of what churches can do with respect to establishing facilities where members can come and worship should be important to us as we move into the 21st century.